Friday 12/30/2011 by ericwyman

YEMSG 2011-12-29 RECAP

Thursday night Phish took the stage at Madison Square Garden for the second of four shows to close out 2011. After a first night where most people had very warm reviews, the second night seems to be a bit more puzzling. After a series of passionate emails among staff here at Phish.net last night fits somewhere comfortably between "amazing" and "frustrating." I mean, we certainly used both words with great frequency but upon further review it's hard to pick which end of the level has more weight. I can probably name more "good" moments than "bad" but for some reason I'm left feeling a bit conflicted. Why is that?

What worked:
Well, the show sure got off to a raucous beginning. After Wednesday night's show opening "Free", the follow up of "Sloth" will put a smile on even the most jaded vets face. It's power and whimsical nonsens-ery is so not the "AC/DC", "KDF", "Possum" that often starts the show. But the real fireworks came in the second slot, when out of nowhere the opening notes of "You Enjoy Myself" rang out. Pure elation filled the arena and surely the homes of most people on the webcast. The former staple of Phish's catalog has been reduced to only 5 appearances this year and furthermore, lessened into an exercise of the ordinary and expected. But both this version and its predecessor in Chicago can put hope in the hearts of many that YEM is beginning to rise again to glory. Certainly far from the most legendary of its performances, this version once again found Trey engaged and extending the guitar based portion of the jam instead of dropping his instrument to ground for a dance routine in the drum and bass segment. YEM is and will always be the magnum opus of this band so seeing a sparks in its performance is a very, very, very good thing.

Also, Page was an absolute monster in that first set. His solo in "Funky Bitch" really carried the version into notable territory and provided some nice contrast from the standard guitar firepower.

In the second set it was all about the silky transition into "Lifeboy" and the phenomenal "Mike's Groove." Echoing the sentiment of the earlier "YEM" the second set's highlights focus once again on what once was old becoming new again. "Lifeboy" a staple request among many long time fans is akin to getting a postcard from a girl you kissed at summer camp. You immediately remember how awesome and beautiful they were and wonder why you force yourself to live without them. Most shows get some serious shit at any inclusion of a ballad, but "Lifeboy" is a perfect example of why they can be so precious. Even the later inclusion of "Show of Life" was a great example of using the tempo of a song to control emotion. Plus, it wasn't gonna be the encore on this night, so extra points there.

Following the second set Guyute, I don't think I was alone in hoping for that epic "David Bowie" from 17 years earlier to materialize and blow the roof off MSG. It's funny how we hold on to these moments in the past and hope that they will recreate themselves somehow. Silly really, but maybe it's akin to chasing that first buzz or that first kiss that you've long forgotten the sensation for. Ironically, what did follow was "Mike's Song." The song that gets little modern day respect because of the omission of that much sought after "second jam". You want it, I want it, we all want it, and for some reason until it happens, "Mike's" kinda sucks. Needless to say, it didn't happen on this night either, but what did happen was a ripping jam segment led by Trey that evoked hints of great versions from years past. Pure energy, pure guitar, awesome stuff. And as the collective sigh let out upon the end of "Mike's," Trey went immediately into "Chalk Dust Torture" to catch everyone by surprise. Continuing the fire from the previous number, "CDT" pressed on at a furious pace until suddenly, at full speed, Trey began to play the riff to "I Am Hydrogen." Now, on a technical scale this is probably the equivalent of the much maligned "DWD -> Sand" from Hartford in 2010, but the resounding opinion on this example is much more positive. Trey took a huge leap and somewhere between the band being on completely different pages and coming back down to the proper tempo, there's a pretty cool moment. But, upon further review it's a lot like a really huge belly flop. Impressive, but certainly a little painful.

Finally, there's the "Weekapaug Groove" that closes the 27 magnificent minutes out. Probably the best version since the band's reunion in 2009, if not since 2000, it is a perfect example of the song's power and greatness. Starting from some playful riffing and interplay and building from a staccato opening stanza, the jam grows in both speed and fervor until its climactic peak filling the room with pure energy. This is the kind of Mike’s Groove you should want every day of the week and twice on Sunday. Even without the second jam.

So? What’s there to gripe about? That sure reads like a lot of praise to me. Replay of Alpharetta this is not.

What could have been better:
Polish and flow. Outside of the two opening songs, the entire first set is hurky jerky ride that stops and starts with an overall tempo that just doesn’t seem to jive. After “YEM,” “Get Back on the Train” felt like a new show was starting, not building on one that’s already going. Join that with the rollercoaster of “Maze,” “Roses Are Free,” “Halley’s Comet” and something just felt off. We’re talking about highly critical and technical points here, but the difference between a really great show and an ok show exists in these details. But on a night like last night the current practice of playing from a list of songs in whatever order the mood strikes, seems to be limiting the final output. If the band spent 30 minutes writing down a composed setlist before the show and preparing mentally and physically for that would a better show appear? This band is so fucking good that they can pretty much play anything they want at any moment, just because they are that good. They can walk onto a stage for soundcheck and create improvised music that is as powerful as it is seemingly effortless. Continuing with the previous diving analogy, there’s a reason why Olympic judges operate the way they do. Because when you’re that good at something you need to be judged on the smallest details, it’s just how you define true greatness. So do these minuscule nicks create a “bad” show? Hell, no. But it does separate it from a truly great one. That’s why divers climb out of the water shaking their heads sometime when it all looked good from home.

The first two shows at MSG have some amazing high points. They are quite numerous in fact. With December 30th being a definite night of greatness in Phish lore, this may just be the night the judges have very little to gripe about.

If you liked this blog post, one way you could "like" it is to make a donation to The Mockingbird Foundation, the sponsor of Phish.net. Support music education for children, and you just might change the world.


Comments

, comment by easywind111
easywind111 If they leave out the Show of Life> Character Zero. E:Loving Cup

and instead play:

Twist> Slave To The Traffic Light. E: Frankenstein

there would be nothing wrong with this show.

, comment by TheManMulcahy
TheManMulcahy Great review. And though I do agree with easywind11, and wonder about the "playing from a list vs. pre-planned set flow" you discussed, from where I was I standing it was a very good show. It'll take a good couple of relistens on my part, but it's not too often these days I see an entire venue, from the floor to the rafters, actually dancing and gettin' down nearly the entire length of the show. Looking out onto the sea of people, it was a true writhing mass of grooving fans for both sets (except for maybe Show Of Life). No dead spots in the stands with folks just observing for several songs, etc. That entire place was gettin' down, for every song. And I think that says a lot. One can dissect & critique the length or depth of jams, song placement and the like (for good reason), but the energy under that roof last night was just amazing. I'm sure they'll top it tonight and/or tomorrow, but I for one felt that was a sight to behold last night.
, comment by tmwsiy
tmwsiy you were able to put into words my incoherent rumbling to myself last night after taking out the headphones... I didn't even know what I was saying..

spot on. great assessment of the night.

I do hope we get a Nadia Comăneci night tonight: Tens across the board!

, comment by barefootbob
barefootbob Very well done, Eric. Pretty much nailed it.

It is hard to sometimes try to remember that these guys are human. I am not sure if prep for these types of shows happens or not. You would have to believe that there is a setlist of somekind - But the flow of a show and the songs that come with it can change with the energy, we have all felt it. They do too. The UIC show is prime example when 'Timber' was supposed to happen and 'Undermind' happened instead. The set is legendary either way, would that be the case if Timber did happen?

We, individually, may always be chasing that NEXT 'ONE' perfect show.
Anyways, still a good show and thanks for the excellent read.
, comment by RunawayJim4180
RunawayJim4180 @TheManMulcahy said:
Great review. And though I do agree with easywind11, and wonder about the "playing from a list vs. pre-planned set flow" you discussed, from where I was I standing it was a very good show. It'll take a good couple of relistens on my part, but it's not too often these days I see an entire venue, from the floor to the rafters, actually dancing and gettin' down nearly the entire length of the show. Looking out onto the sea of people, it was a true writhing mass of grooving fans for both sets (except for maybe Show Of Life). No dead spots in the stands with folks just observing for several songs, etc. That entire place was gettin' down, for every song. And I think that says a lot. One can dissect & critique the length or depth of jams, song placement and the like (for good reason), but the energy under that roof last night was just amazing. I'm sure they'll top it tonight and/or tomorrow, but I for one felt that was a sight to behold last night.
I think that speaks more to the crowd at MSG than the show itself. Take 12/4/09 for example, the crowd was drowning out the PA at points during First Tube. Absolutely mind blowing energy, for a show most people think was a bit sloppy overall. I think your observation is a good one though, and at the end of the day, if you had fun at the show does anything else really matter?
, comment by justinwendt
justinwendt In context of listening to a show five years from now? Yes, it does matter. Thanks for the excellent honest recap.
, comment by Uakari
Uakari
You are conflicted becuase YOU can no longer have fun.
How about a review instead of an opinion?
, comment by Cavern
Cavern My God People, do you ever go and just quit bitching?? I would prefer a less nerd like approach to these guys...."they don't play like they used to" ..... "I wish Trey would play like he used to " ......."Phish 95 was on fire" .... referencing days LONG GONE..."man I wish they would play Tweezer like they used to" ....QUIT GOING TO SHOWS....Jesus, "you" people need to find a new band....just shut your hole... you talk about NO LIFE, They have been and will continue to be THE BEST BAND EVER
, comment by gratefulkeith
gratefulkeith What we all forget is that a. They haven't made a new album in years. B. That their are "generations" of fans so not everyone Likes the same "styles" that phish offers some like newer phish while some of us are into gamehenge. But thhey are playin to everyone and every one hears it a bit differently. I just think it's all good so sit backand enjoy what it is. The Best band ever
, comment by phishhead96
phishhead96 rift too wow I cant beleave Im not at the show
, comment by ADAWGWYO
ADAWGWYO @Uakari said:
You are conflicted becuase YOU can no longer have fun.
How about a review instead of an opinion?
Oh jesus! Butt hurt?
, comment by wattznext
wattznext Lol at butthurt
, comment by safetymeeting
safetymeeting You people that flare up when people criticize Phish: are you real? Seriously. . .it has to be a joke, right?
, comment by jaredprox
jaredprox A masterpiece last night was not, but multiple 'gasm moments and the band clearly having fun puts it in the top 75%. It's funny, a lot of people claim 12/31/95 as being GOAT, but if they were to play that show note for note today we'd pick it apart.

p.s. an extra 2 cents... it makes such a difference when Trey is relaxed. I think he needs to loosen up somehow pre-show. BJ's? We know booze and benzos are out of the question.
, comment by Purple_Humpback_Whale
Purple_Humpback_Whale I felt that was a very good review. plus one sir
, comment by ecce_homo
ecce_homo Disclaimers: Old Dead Head (first show Philadelphia 1979)

First Phish show around 1990/91 in Somerville, Mass. Previous Phish Show: Fenway Park.

Consider myself adept musically.

Impressions of show: Class venue (goes without saying). 16th row center orchestra (thanks online lottery).

Many theories of art postulate that art rotates in cycles. First there is the development of a theme, then its perfection, then its attenuation. I saw Phish at Lemonwheel and It and many other shows (probably 20 or 30 in all), and what I saw last night was simply extraordinary. Phish has reached the "baroque" period in their development where, having "perfected" their art, they actively seek to "attenuate" it, that is, draw out or emphasize certain elements for special attention.

Last night the beat was slightly syncopated, everything was held back or twisted in the most ephemeral or slight degree possible. They evinced perfect control over their instrumentation and the sound, from where I was sitting, was phenomenal, simply sonically perfect. My impression as they were simply toying with the audience last night (the 29th). Song selection was relatively unimportant, I did enjoy the Back on the Train, Simple was good and Show of Life heartfelt. But they were simply fucking with our minds Thursday night, was my impression. They could have done anything they wanted, and instead they subtly, cohesively and monomaniacally altered their "perfect" sound to produce something that was sheerly delightful, it was so masterful.

One of the best Phish shows I have ever seen. I felt it was absolutely perfect in every regard. I listened very attentively, barely moved, kept my eyes directly on the band who were about 30 feet from me. Spectacular, astonishing performance. They were holding back and it was obvious, but they were doing it on purpose and it came off as sheer brilliance.

My impressions, as someone who has played, studied and attentively listened to all sorts of rock and roll for the past 35 years.

Congratulations Phish. You hit the nail on the head.

ps an afternote. There were times they "dropped the ball" and let the rat out of the maze. The ending of Maze was once such moment, Weekapaug another, so was parts of Halley's Comet. But the people who are "kvetching" that they weren't up to snuff may be missing the "fact" that a lot of the "misses" were deliberate, in my opinion.
, comment by Sneknsally
Sneknsally BJs!!! I'm sure 99% of the Noobs would line up to blow Trey... I know I would!!
, comment by ericwyman
ericwyman @Uakari said:
You are conflicted becuase YOU can no longer have fun.
How about a review instead of an opinion?
I agree.
, comment by ericwyman
ericwyman @Cavern said:
My God People, do you ever go and just quit bitching?? I would prefer a less nerd like approach to these guys...."they don't play like they used to" ..... "I wish Trey would play like he used to " ......."Phish 95 was on fire" .... referencing days LONG GONE..."man I wish they would play Tweezer like they used to" ....QUIT GOING TO SHOWS....Jesus, "you" people need to find a new band....just shut your hole... you talk about NO LIFE, They have been and will continue to be THE BEST BAND EVER
I believe you mean "you people."

Also, you should go back and actually read what was written, because you are writing your own script.
, comment by ItalianSpaghetti
ItalianSpaghetti Good show here folks. My humble picks are:

- Only the second Sloth opener since '91 followed by a finely placed and clean played YEM (last slotted here in '04). The 1,2 punch is perhaps my favorite slot for set 1 - approved!

- Crosseyed-> Simple-> Lifeboy. A puntual (and perhaps discussed before CE&P) drop into Simple. Above average, up-tempo, Simple jam faded finely into a bold and beautiful Lifeboy. C> S> L wins employee of the day IMO.

- Mike's Groove. Took the show exactly where it needed to go when it needed to go here. Although sloppy from Chalkdust -> H20, the review says it best: "Trey took a huge leap." This should always be applauded and is very important anymore for Phish 3.0. Kudos! Weekapaug sinks the jumper for the win!!!...wait, there is still time on the clock?...uh-oh :-l

, comment by Frob24
Frob24 I understand both sides of this. I understand the people who want to see perfection and over analyze every moment and I understand the people who this was an awesome and amazing show. I for one am part of the latter group. I thoughts this was an amazing show. I loved the tempo, I thought the first set would end up being considered the highlight of this entire run and most people during the set break were elated about what they just saw. I've seem 57 shows and this one was awesome. I love the new Phish, whatever that even means. They are fantastic. Yes, they make mistakes, yes some song placement could have been better but in the end why do we go to these shows. To be with amazing people in the crowd (most of the time), to feel the energy from both the crowd and the band and hear the great music that we love so much. We also go to see the unexpected, to see what they will do next and we got that. The Sloth, the early and awesome YEM, Roses, the Antelope when the set seemed over, Crosseyed into Simple, Lifeboy, the Mike's into chalk dust into the fast hydrogen into a sick weekapaug, the CharacterZero when most thought the set would end with show of life. Ok, enough of my ramblings. I had a great time with some great people listening to a great band.
, comment by Slothberries
Slothberries @ericwyman said:
@Cavern said:
My God People, do you ever go and just quit bitching?? I would prefer a less nerd like approach to these guys...."they don't play like they used to" ..... "I wish Trey would play like he used to " ......."Phish 95 was on fire" .... referencing days LONG GONE..."man I wish they would play Tweezer like they used to" ....QUIT GOING TO SHOWS....Jesus, "you" people need to find a new band....just shut your hole... you talk about NO LIFE, They have been and will continue to be THE BEST BAND EVER
I believe you mean "you people."

Also, you should go back and actually read what was written, because you are writing your own script.


Ive found that this is often the case on phish.net. when people critique (not criticize) the band, the younger fan often seems to take it as a personal attack. it would be nice to have in depth conversations about the technical aspects of a phish performance, but this will never happen until the reader stops getting offended. when we get offended we tend to hear what we want to hear, which is often light years away from what was actually said. we twist peoples words around to the point where the conversation evolves from a show review into a defensive message board battle. its frustrating and it has pushed many intellegent phish.net users away from the board.

i think you gave an honest, indepth review and i, for one, appreciate it.
, comment by gratefulkeith
gratefulkeith As do i
, comment by Potato_Sacks
Potato_Sacks This is a solid description of this show, I just feel like you're wrong about the Halley's. I thought the jam was strong, it was a lot shorter then usual but way longer then any version form this summer.
, comment by ericwyman
ericwyman @Potato_Sacks said:
This is a solid description of this show, I just feel like you're wrong about the Halley's. I thought the jam was strong, it was a lot shorter then usual but way longer then any version form this summer.
Nothing wrong with what they played, I just thought it contributed to poor flow in the set.
You must be logged in to post a comment.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode