Permalink for Comment #1312851991 by TennesseeJed

, comment by TennesseeJed
TennesseeJed @ericwyman said:
@TennesseeJed said:
There seems to be a double standard here that says it is okay to criticize the show, or subsections of the show, but not to criticize the reviewer.
I would say that your second and third paragraphs were critical of the review, not the reviewer and are therefore exponentially more successful. Someday we'll have a thread that isn't so fucking meta.
Thanks for catching that, I should have said review, not reviewer. There is a huge difference between criticizing a review and criticizing a person. Personal attacks should definitely be off-limits.
Score: 1    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19
Summer Tour 2024 Reprise 2024-09-15
The First and Last Words from Dick's 2024-09-07


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode