Permalink for Comment #1313017124 by michaelnelson

, comment by michaelnelson
michaelnelson I think you tend to give Phish 2.0 too much credit. Here's what their history boils down to for me: 1) there's Phish (until the hiatus and since the breakup) and 2) there was that sucky Phish-wannabe band with their short shows, endless guitar-loop-space-"jams" and repetitive setlists (known as 2.0).

The REAL Phish is BACK... enjoy it, they are at the top of their game.
Score: 1    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19
Summer Tour 2024 Reprise 2024-09-15
The First and Last Words from Dick's 2024-09-07


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode