Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
More to the point though, in disregarding first sets we're completing overlooking some great jams. The 6/8 Roses, the 7/1 Fee (one of the highlights of the tour). Frankly I'm surprised that official .net nerds signed off on this truncated summary (who collecitvely voted on this list anyway?). What happens when you want to start comparing the above to previous 3.0 shows? Do we rule out 8.7.09 I? 11.17.97 I? Why are we giving Phish a pass on the first sets and telling them they don't matter?
I'm being a bit facetious and ultimately just nitpicking as well; this list is great and I agree with much of the above in terms of second sets. A few exceptions:
I think 7/3 is among Vermont's finest. The Sand-> Golden Age sequence may be the best jamming of the tour. And in terms of fourth quarter filler in this day and age, I'll take a Bug Fluffhead Wedge over Cavern, Julius, Suzie..
I'd also take some issue with the 7/6 praise on the strength of the Sally. It's a great jam and one of the better sets of the tour. But better than the 7/3 Sand or Golden Age? The 7/1 Fee? The 6/15 Birds? The 6/23 Light? The 7/8 Piper? The 6/7 Carini? It's just not in my top 5 jams is all.
And I think I prefer 6/28 to 6/29, and 6/22 to 6/16.
My two cents!