Permalink for Comment #1342549994 by deadphish28

, comment by deadphish28
deadphish28 Leaving out the 1st set IS kind of dull, imo. That's like cherry picking shows from 1997 when they played 5-7 song first sets, pointing to them as greatest shows ever, and disregarding the 2nd sets. I think you should take the whole show into account. If they didn't jam or create "original music" enough for your tastes in the first frame, then reduce the show's ranking accordingly. I'm tired of people basing a show's merit on 2-3 jams in the second set. You don't review a play on a per-act basis, I don't see why this should be any different. That being said, I appreciate your taking the time to do this, and it's truly difficult either way. I just can't get behind what is essentially a review of 50% of the music that was played.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode