Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
If ANYONE were making that argument, what you're saying might have some bearing on the subject.
But they aren't. No one is suggesting that you don't "miss out on something" by not being at the show. Of course you miss out on a lot. No one is claiming that listening to tapes of a show gives them the "full experience of a show."
So you're arguing, in part, against something that isn't even being put forward.
And you're seemingly neglecting to realize that, unfortunate as it may be, it is nevertheless true that many aspects of what it means to *really* be there and *really* experience the show are also intensely subjective, variable and, as everyone who sees shows and later listens to recordings realizes, capable of interfering with a judgement of the music.
So it's fine to say, "I only care about the real experience of the show" -- but most of us are going to miss most shows. Therefore I'm always going to prefer a review of the music (which is all I'm going to ever get if I miss the show), uncolored by the fleeting phantoms of the in-person experience which never make it to the tapes.
More absentee reviews, please!