Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
This is probably the most important point of the whole piece. Keeping this one bit of wisdom in mind when reading reviews seems like a proper modus operandi going forward, for me anyways. That is always my hang-up, trying to reconcile my own subjectivity with that of others. In the end, 'nothing I see can be taken from me,' which is perhaps all that matters, but I think it's healthy and actually pretty challenging (yet rewarding) to be open-minded when hearing someone else's take on an experience s/he shared in common with one's own experience, whether that be by way of a recording or in-person. The lengthy discussion the OP spawned speaks to that challenge.