Permalink for Comment #1368983544 by ericwyman

, comment by ericwyman
ericwyman @Tmbgnicu said:
the problem is he put it on the #1 site for all things Phish, and one of the oldest fan sites on the internet. If you me to expand on that for you, I will, but I trust you understand what I am getting at. Something like this belongs on the blogger's personal blog, not this site. The post has a negative feel to it, and it is not a negative review of a show, but rather a negative blanket statement about his feelings for the band. Yes, I am sure he loves(d) Phish, and everyone appreciates his work as a volunteer admin for this site. But it sounds like Phish has run their course in his life right now, so why post here about it?
Wrong. So wrong. There wasn't a negative sentiment in my mind at the time I wrote it.
Go read it again, I'll give you time to try and decipher the actual point I was making. There's a massive number of people here on this jaded-fan witchhunt, I'm sorry that anything short of "OMG, my face melted" doesn't tease your intellect.

To everyone else who had a problem with where this was posted... @mrjones @theemporerjoker @runlikeacantelope

I am a blogger here. This is my (shared) blog. I don't need another venue.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode