Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
Can we please, PLEASE, not over emphasize the "set I=lackluster" comparison anymore? I agree, the "heat" comes in the second set, but lets all be honest here, and bare our hearts for a minute: the songs played in the first set are fire songs, because they are Phish songs that we love almost 100% of the time. But in the past, they used to play big, huge songs in the first set, and sometimes they didn't; in 2004, they let it fly in the first set, for instance. But I see both sets as the whole night, the buzz before lights fall and "what are they gonna open with?!?!" feeling, the sound, what they'll play set I and NOT set II, etc. The whole night is Phish, not second half.
And, the Tahoe Tweezer was killer, no doubt. Great. But, to rank a whole show based on one big song alone, at #3 for the whole year, THIS year especially, over even the New Year's show? Personally, I thought the truck set struck me as more important and memorable than the Tweezer: the old instruments, the closeness and intimacy, the song selection, location in venue...all that.