Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
"I'm not using the terms "tonicization" and "modulation" in the same way you would when undertaking an analysis of Baroque or Classical music"
Well, yes and no. They aren't just terms for analyzing baroque or classical music (hence my Taylor Swift nod). "Waste" has a V/IV tonicization. It's in D, we get a D7, which "tonicizes" the following G. That's just what a tonicization is, plain and simple, a fancy term for when a secondary dominant happens. However, modulations of the sort I'm describing are certainly almost exclusive to "classical" music styles. So I think I see what you're getting at, you kinda used it like a ratio. In a style of music (baroque for instance) where key changes happen very quickly and frequently, modulation and tonicization mean one thing, but in a style of music where one key is vamped in for sometimes 15 minutes, the usage of those terms then becomes adapted to account for longer spans of time as well. I can get behind this. (emoji intended)